If someone asked me if I think that Facebook allows you to communicate, I would say it depends on how you use it.
It 's true, you can exchange messaggi istantanei, mail, chattare, lasciare messaggi sulla bacheca, ...
In questi casi la comunicazione è molto simile a quella personale, con la differenza che può risultare “fredda”, ma ciò può dipendere anche dai rapporti con l’altra persona (dal fatto che sia un amico, o un conoscente, o uno che proprio non ci conosce), dal fatto che non ci si possa “toccare” o vedere per intero, dall’ambiente in cui ci si trova quando si interagisce (in camera, o in ufficio, o in un internet caffè, o con il fidanzato nelle vicinanze...)
Bene, penso che tutto questo sia opinione diffusa, ma non necessariamente valid.
In fact, I think that all communication is, indeed, the internet itself is communication.
Everything you do on the internet and communicate with anything, especially what you do with Facebook: the publication of photos, videos, music, sharing our thoughts, ..., everything communicates something to us. Our taste, our personality, our preferences, our interests, our moods. And there will always be someone who receives these reports: the peer marketing companies.
So if everything is communication, plays a vital role to play (in this case listening is not given only hearing, but also the reading of a text, the interpretation of a dynamic content like a video, a picture, a song, ...).
The type of communication depends on the type of play: a communication will be a non-communication if there will be no one to listen.
A notice will be a superficial communication if the person is distracted or disinterested we listen to our arguments.
A notice will be a true and authentic communication if the person who hears us is willing to stake his inner and his innermost self.
It follows that a static stimulus, which can be, for example, the publication of a photo can become a dynamic element if caught by a sensitive person to listen.
0 comments:
Post a Comment